TheSmokingJacket.com will contain none of the nudity that makes Playboy.com NSFW - not suitable for work. Instead, it'll rely on humor to reach Playboy's target audience, men 25 to 34 years old, when they are most likely to be in front of a computer screen.
Óo meuz amigozzzze... mas o que é que se passa aqui?
Estava-se mesmo a ver que era só publicar um post sobre imaginação fértil, hmmm, e começam logo a puxar hmmm para a preversidade hmmm. PSPs? Não havia nexexidade...
Vamos lá continuar mas com cuidado...
Ah pois é desta vez foi o Pedrito e a Pipa que estão mais velhos! Parabéns aos dois que são quase semi-gémeos falsos!!
O Pedrito já atingiu a 3ª idade ganhando assim o estatuto de velhote e a Pipa que já tinha virado galinha o ano passado aproxima-se do estatuto galinha-mãe.
Por falar em aniversários, à 6 anos que a malta anda a tentar que o Oscar organize uma Mega Party para celebrar o seu aniversário!! Será que é este ano? Hmmm we never know....
Muahahaha o primeiro Post de Julho é meu :P
Muahahahahahaha o último Post de Junho é meu!!!
Muahahahahahahahahaha o Post nº 300 é meu!!!!!!!
Muahahahahahahahahahahahaha O Álvaro faz anos hoje!!! PARABÉNS PÁ!!! Ficas a dever uma jantarada e uns copos à malta :P
Hoje estive a falar com o Álvaro e ele disse-me que (para além de eu ser muito gira e ser uma diva) está a organizar uma grande festa para nós todos em Lisboa hoje à noite.
Atenção a todos!Pois é eles andam ai à caça... e desta vez a vítima foi o Pedrito!
Dois meses a andar a pé só fazem é bem ao corpinho :) Quem será o próximo?
Ahaha! O primeiro post de Junho é meu! Mauahahahahaahahahaha
Está calor e tal... e pronto era só para dizer isto...
Na sequência da ultima noticia os nosso reporteres foram à rua fazer um estudo à opinião pública sobre o assunto:
Troll - criaturas antropomórficas do folclore escandinavo. Poderiam ser tanto gigantes horrendos - como ogros - ou como pequenas criaturas semelhantes a goblins. Viviam em cavernas ou grutas subterrâneas.
No entanto um Troll , na gíria da internet, designa uma pessoa cujo comportamento tende sistematicamente a desestabilizar uma discussão, provocar e enfurecer as pessoas envolvidas nelas.
Que podemos concluir? Que o Oscar nos anda a chamar de criaturas horrendas ou de pessoas provocadoras e desestabilizadoras às suas ideias?
| 1. | que não se pode medir |
| 2. | que não tem medida comum com outro ou outros objectos |
| 3. | imenso; enorme |
| MATEMÁTICA antiga designação de número irracional |
on tools for fixing the house and the car and then dont expect
to find their wife under the car or on the roof? Why do the wife
get -shopping money- to just spend away as a sick hobby?
Did you know women do 85% of buying decisions (an American example).
Men are not the oppressors of women. The simple proof of
that is that WOMEN ARE NOT OPRESSED. Women are
not now, and never have been -opressed-. Women have the
right to vote with NO concomitant obligation to be drafted in
time of war to protect their right to vote. How did they get the
one without being forced to assume the other? They have
power without responsibility, just like when It comes to the
divorced father that HAS to pay but has only a theoretical
right to see his child. The only way democracy got reborn
in the modern world was because men faught and died
battling their kings, a certain German Furer (in Stalingrad,
Kursk, Karelen, in Normandy, in the Alps, at sea and in
the air) and corporations to seize this right. Women took
place in the war industry meanwhile, but its a lie that women
fought for their right to vote and men dod not. Women gained
It by fighting a tiny theoretical war in comparison.
A -courageous- ideological struggle..
Women are not expected to perform heavy labour - laying
bricks, puoring asphalt, fixing cars. They live in houses they
do not build, drive cars they cant fix and eat food they do not
grow grow. Is this opression? In fact, women are coddled, not
opressed. Women are strident and pushy and obnoxious in
ways men never can be because we would get punched or
shamed or arrested, and they would not - since they are
j u s t women.
Did you know The -equality- idea done the way the feminists
today are trying to proclaim it, is devastationg for our families
and has been destructive since we once started growing crops
and building households on the premises that we want to
collect more stuff and satisfy our craving women on the farm.
The materialistic society destroying both the family and now the
planet we live on is a problem connected to the loss of the
masculinity and the masculine visionary thinking, the masculine
spirituality. Men do not want Hummers, It is a manhole thing..
Things we dissillutioned pussies think we want because
there is women whispering they want.. Ever since we gat kings
in dresses who could give women a castle to live in, the
masculinity has faded away. The most manly car is (hold you
r wholy horses) NO car AT ALL :).. A Horse? The author sees
this not as a political problem, but a spiritual problem.
It requires a spiritual sollution that means living with less to regain
the meaning of life. The author says women are not the enemy.
The enemy is the materialistic greed and the lack of illutions in
the feminine world promoting shopping, shopping and even more
shopping. To live in peace and to see your own kids grow up
should be every persons reality but unfortunately it is not the
case. It is OK to be a man.. Everything else starts with that.
Some Chapters:
We need to regenerate a male-flavoured spirituality
Men and women have swapped mental roles
The feminization of human society began 8000 years ago.
Women are more materialistic than men.
Men are more spiritual than women.
Men are not the cause of war."
in http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3868965/What_men_know_that_women_dont
(caso alguém esteja interessado em aprofundar este assunto)
